Was the Flood Universal or Isolated?

As I research this subject, the findings are dependant on the age of the commentary, and the source, whereas some comment that the flood was universal, while others conclude that it was an isolated event, and that the Biblical account has been taken out of context. I tend to agree with the latter, that the flood was an isolated event, and that the story grew and grew until it has become this well believed myth, and has lead to much scrutiny upon the Holy Scriptures. First, the position that the flood was in fact an isolated event is based upon the study of the original languages, second, upon geological and regional evidence, and third, it is based on the scientific impossibility, it is assumed that the date of the flood was approximately 2,348 BC, and many scholars look to an earlier date, so to believe this worldwide deluge happened, means that all animate live has regenerated within 4,351 years, and repopulated the earth, and also has evolved into all varieties, from the Negro to the Asiatic, from the Aryan to the Aborigine. Thus we all can look at this picture from a reasonable view and conclude that the story as told by the churches is impossible.

First we look into an elder Zondervan publication, “The Zondervan Pictorial Bible Dictionary” to find this commentary; “VIII. The Universality of the Flood. One of the great differences in opinion in describing the Flood concerns its extent Traditionally most Biblical interpreters considered the submergence to be universal; that is; that it covered the entire globe including the highest mountains. The reason proposed to defend this viewpoint include the fact that in the Gen. Account universal terms are used. “All the high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered” (Gen 7:19) and “all flesh died” (Gen 7:21) It has been pointed out that if the flood were local there would be no need for an ark to preserve Noah, for God could have directed him to move with the animals to an area that was not to be submerged. The fact that many civilizations have flood traditions has been cited as an evidence for a universal flood. The same evidence could be used to argue for a local flood because the accounts of floods in other parts of the world are less like the Hebrew tradition than those of the Assyrians and Babylonians who lived in the same areas as the Hebrews. Today many conservative scholars defend a local flood. The crux of their argument seems to center in the covenant relation of God to man. He deals with certain groups, such as the children of Israel. The reasoning in regard to Noah is that Noah was not a preacher of righteousness to peoples of other areas but was concerned with the culture from which Abraham eventually came. Physical arguments have also been raised against a universal flood: origin and disposal of the amount of water necessary to make a layer six miles thick over the whole world, the effect upon plant life by being covered for a year, the effect upon fresh water life of a sea which contained salt from the ocean, and the fact that many topographic features of the earth such as cinder cones which show no evidence of erosion by a flood and which are much older than the flood could possibly be. It seems, therefore, that a person could advocate either a local or a universal concept of the Flood and find evidence to support his view.”

My comment upon the Zondervan explanation is what I usually have to comment about these so-called experts, with their so-called expert opinions, and this is that like all the other resources that I have come across, they are too cowardly to state the truth for fear of offending the opposition, and have left out the most important source of all, the Holy Scriptures form the original languages. However, believing that credit is due, they did actually point out that some “believe” in a localized Flood, much to their credit, while most keep touting the usual story of a universal catastrophe of impossible proportions, with their scientific impossibilities left out, because it does not support the accepted view. So to once and for all show that the Flood was an isolated event, let us start with the Holy Scriptures in their original tongues.

Gen 7:18  And the waters prevailed and increased greatly on the earth; ⁽¹⁾ and the ark went on the face of the waters.

Gen 7:19  And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth; and all the high mountains ⁽²⁾ that are under all the heavens ⁽³⁾ were covered.

Gen 7:20  Fifteen cubits ⁽⁴⁾ upward the waters prevailed; and the mountains ⁽⁵⁾ were covered. ⁽⁶⁾

1. Earth ['erets,  eh'-rets] from an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land):--X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X natins, way, + wilderness, world.
2. High Mountains
   1. High [gaboahh,  gaw-bo'-ah] or (fully) gabowahh gaw-bo'-ah; from 1361; elevated (or elated), powerful, arrogant:--haughty, height, high(-er), lofty, proud, X exceeding proudly.

b.     Mountains [har] a shortened form of 2042; a mountain or range of hills (sometimes used figuratively):--hill (country), mount(-ain), X  promotion.

3. Under all the heavens
   1. Under [tachath,  takh'-ath] from the same as 8430; the bottom (as depressed); only adverbially, below (often with prepositional prefix underneath), in lieu of, etc.:--as, beneath, X flat, in(-stead), (same) place (where...is), room, for...sake, stead of, under, X unto, X when...was mine, whereas, (where-)fore, with.
   2. all the heavens [shamayim,  shaw-mah'-yim] dual of an unused singular shameh shaw-meh'; from an unused root meaning to be lofty; the sky (as aloft; the dual perhaps alluding to the visible arch in which the clouds move, as well as to the higher ether where the celestial bodies revolve):--air, X astrologer.
4. Fifteen cubits, A cubit, according to whichever source you look upon for information, is always different. The generally understood measurement of a cubit is to be the distance between the tips of the fingers to the elbow, which is against toe commonly associated measure given of 18 inches, seeing that most peoples measure would them be over 20 inches, therefore we find from archaeological research that two measures were used, the standard and the irregular cubit, the standard cubit said to be about 25.5 inches, so we can only assume that the flood water was 30 feet deep.

5.        Mountains [har] a shortened form of 2042; a mountain or range of hills (sometimes used figuratively):--hill (country), mount(-ain), X  promotion.

6.        Covered [kacah  kaw-saw'] a primitive root; properly, to plump, i.e. fill up hollows; by implication, to cover (for clothing or secrecy):--clad self, close, clothe, conceal, cover (self), (flee to) hide, overwhelm.

Now we have to decipher this, First let us start with Genesis 7:19, “And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth; and all the high mountains that are under all the heavens  were covered.” Now what is referred to as a “high mountain” here in the scripture is a conjoined word in the Hebrew with “all” and “mountain” and then separate, “high”, and this means what it implies, and this is a high mountain range, a massive upheaval of rock, so we have this understood, the Hebrew would translate, all the mountains high, and we find that in this application, the word also means the face of a mountain, the root of a mountain range, generally what is visible of a mountain from the side profile. Now  the term “under all the heavens” is two words, one stands for a depression, or an abyss, the land below, and then the word “heavens” is what we would use for the sky, as we see it visibly. Then we have the words, “were covered”, which is not at all what the word means, it means to cover by concealment, or to fill in areas, so we have two possibilities from this word, either the mountains were the container of this flood, or the mountains were inundated in this flood, and we will see the height of the water in the next passage.

Now we look at Gen 7:20  “Fifteen cubits upward the waters prevailed; and the mountains were covered. ^”  So we know that the water depth was set at about 30 feet, but here he have the word mountains again, and in the Hebrew, the word is not conjoined, and in this application, it is usually translated “hill country”, so we have two separate words being translated mountains, when the Hebrew shows clearly that the two words have a separate meaning.

Hence we conclude that in the first case, the words meant that the mountain ranges were the container of the Flood, and then in the second sense, we have it here that this flood was 30 feet over the height of the hill country, which by the way is a very deep flood, but however, did not break out of these ranges of mountains, because they were what was filled in from the Hebrew meaning of the word. Thus from the original Hebrew, we have the case made in the correct translation, that the Flood was an isolated event, and as for the commentary by the experts, we read from the passage that the intent was to kill off the inhabitants of the land, not Noah, and his Ark was symbolic, as we will find later

Where was the Flood?

First, we need to start by destroying the myth that these events took place in Mesopotamia, and this one is easy. We go to the story of the Tower of Babel, and the first passages Genesis 11:1-2 “And the whole earth had one language, and the same words. And it came to pass as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and dwelt there.” Now Shinar is the ancient name of Mesopotamia, and it says here that they journeyed from the east of this region, so we are now East of Iraq and Iran.

Second, We go to the area before the Flood, Gen 2:10-14; “10 And waters spread throughout Eden [12] to water the protected garden; and from there they divided, and became four heads. 11 The name of the first is Pishon: [13] that is it which borders the region of Chavilah, [14] or where there is gold; 12 And the gold of that region is bountiful: there is bdellium and gem stones. 13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: [15] the same is it that borders the region of Cush [16] 14 And the name of the third river is Chiddekel: [17] that flows eastward to Awshyre. [18] And the fourth river is the Perath. [19] 15 And YHVH of Hosts reserved for the Aryan, and appointed him to the protected garden called Eden to control it and to protect it.” [New Aryan Translation]

[12] Pamir-western China-Northern India-Afghanistan Region Generally considered to be in Tajikistan [13] Indus River [14] The Border of India-Pakistan begins north of India [15] Oxus River [16] Cush is the ancient name of India river borders India and Uzbekistan [17] Tarim River [18] Tarim Basin-western China-rooted in “to twist a thread from right to left” or west to east-Xinjiang region of China-the name Assyria in most translations appears to be in error of the intent [19] Jaxartes River-Kyrgystan-Tajikistan region

Although the words Tigris and Euphrates are used, it is impossible to assume the Mesopotamian region, because as we know, the people of the Bible traveled from the east to build Babel, so we look to the east and we find the only place in the world where four rivers flow off from one point, and go in opposing directions, and we find the Tarim Basin of Western China, North of India, East of Afghanistan, and south of the former Soviet Union. This region is particularly interesting because it is a large hole in the ground, about twice the size of California, surrounded by immense mountain ranges, a site that can answer the description of the Flood event, as in the Mountain ranges being the container, and the hill country being inundated. As a note, the current region is now a desert, uninhabitable, and is the only region that answers the geographical survey for Eden, and further, fits the description for the land of the flood.

The Geography of this region not only corresponds to the Biblical account of the region we are looking for, but further, we find evidence, having proven that Mesopotamia is not a possibility, and that Pamir matches the account, we go to the scriptures and find that Adam and Eve were sent to the East of the Garden, which would leave them in this region, the Tarim Basin, where Noah and his family lived.

Genesis 3:23-24 “Therefore the YAHWEH God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from which he was taken. So he drove out the man: and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubim, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”

The Universal Flood Myth Against Scripture

We have traced the Bible Backwards and foreword to establish that the people in Babel came from the east, and Babel is in modern Iraq. Iraq is where most so-called “Bible Scholars” tell you that Noah’s Ark landed. Now tracing their steps “from the east” into “Shinar” which is modern Mesopotamia, we find Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan, then India and China. We also looked at the Garden of Eden, and from the scriptures themselves, we can obviously see that Mesopotamia does not account for the region of the scriptures, however Pamir does. After we read of the contamination of the Aryan, we see that YAHWEH cast the Aryans out of Eden, and set up a guard upon the “East of Eden”, which simple logic points to a very simple fact, you guard the east to protect from the east. So we follow this simple formula and end up in modern China in the Xinjiang region, or the Tarim Basin as the location of the Flood.

Now we look at the Scriptures again and realize that the height of the water is recorded as approximately 30 feet in modern measurements. Once again, the question as to how a 30 foot deluge can cover the world and all of the mountains calls into question the commonly accepted view. Now furthermore, we look into the Hebrew and find that what modern so-called “Bible Scholars” use as evidence for their “Global Flood Theory”, is the error in translation which states that the mountains were 30 feet down, when the Hebrew clearly states “hill country”. Once again the flooding of rolling plains cannot cover the mountains, but then we see that in the Hebrew it states that the mountains were the container, and not submerged.

So we have the correct Flood Story from the Scriptures detailing a regional flood in a region surrounded by mountains, and now all science and knowledge does not have to be discarded to verify a false “Global Flood”. 

What was the Purpose of the Flood?

In sharp contrast to the theories that Noah and his family were the only eight survivors of the flood, we have the true believers of the Racial Covenant making the claim that the flood was an Isolated event, and that all mankind is not descended from Noah, his three sons, and their four collective wives. Although this will seem as a shock to those of the mainstream cults, we need to Isolate these claims and look at them from a strictly scientific viewpoint.

Let us first acknowledge the claim that Ham is the so-called progenitor of the Negroes, and that Japheth is the so-called progenitor of the Oriental races, and that Shem is the progenitor of the White races. I was wondering, then, what race was Noah, and how dark of a Negro was Ham’s wife, how Asian was Japheth’s wife and, how White was Shem’s wife for these races to have developed so drastically different?

Have you ever seen a Nordic man and a Nordic woman breed a Negro? An Asian? Or a Mestizo? Have you ever seen Negro male and female breed any other race than their own? Then how could Noah and His family breed all these other races? It is a scientific impossibility and even the most radical liberal fool that so desires to believe that we are all the same has to acknowledge the impossibility of pure breed production of another breed, or for mongrel breeds to split and faction off into such a variety in such a short time. To the evolutionists, who truly believe that conditions can cause such drastic changes in such a short time, let us look at the paintings of dark aged Europe, middle aged Europe, and modern Europe, and compare them, to find that in 1,500 years there has been absolutely NO change in the appearance of Europeans, let us now go to the Roman Era, and look at the statues, how they resemble Europeans today, as they did back then. Let us go further into our history and look at the Greek empire, their statues, and notice the stark European resemblance to the modern descendants of these same Europeans, and we have confirmed over a 2,500 year stretch, that the same breed produces the same breed continually, as long as there is no mongrelization.

Now lets look at this in a more realistic fashion, and double the stretch of time to 5,000 years, are we to believe that the first half of this five millennium managed to be under different scientific laws than the second, and that couples spawned all different varieties for just the first half, although science and a discerning eye can prove otherwise? If this is to be believed, that we all descended from Noah, from the Aryan to the Negro, than we must throw out all the laws of science and nature, and blindly believe what the preachers have been saying, and that is that the laws of nature did not exist for some time after the flood, but then did shortly thereafter. I will tell you that science has simply proven the Holy Scriptures to be absolutely correct, as usual, and all one needs to do is look into the original language to see that the Flood Event was a regional flood, involving only one area, and only one race and it’s mongrel progeny was destroyed with the exception of a few select stock of purebreds. This explains why so many cultures have the flood story, with their own spin, handed down from their own ancients, who lived right through it, because they were not in it.

1

Let us first examine my claim that the flood was sent as destruction, for the mongrels of one race, and that the survivors were saved for their genetic purity, and their purity of beliefs.

Genesis 6:1-4 “It happened, when men began to multiply on the surface of the ground, and daughters were born to them, that God's sons ^[1] saw that men's ^[2] daughters were beautiful, and they took for themselves wives of all that they chose. [Yahweh said, "My Spirit will not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; yet will his days be one hundred twenty years."] ^[3] The Nephilim ^[4] were in the earth in those days, and also after that ^[5], when God's sons came to men's daughters. They bore children to them: the same were the mighty men ^[6] who were of old, men of renown. ^[7]”

1.        Eloheem; A plurality of God, or gods, is used for either the heavenly hosts, or the fallen angels, demons, is sometimes referred to as the race of man descended from Adam.

2.        Awdawm; from which we get Adam or Man, in the elder dialect of Hebrew, or Chaldean, this term is used for both man, as descended from Adam, or mankind in general, in Chaldean, the elder language, this term is used for all mankind whether or not descended from Adam, or a pre-Adamic race. Likewise in Aramaic, also an elder language, although in both the Aramaic and Chaldean, it is clearly stated that the word is rooted in the Awdawm race, the Adamic or Aryan race. The very term Awdawm is rooted in the ability to turn color, as in to blush, which is strictly an Aryan trait, from which we get the seasonal term Autumn, for the turning of the color of foliage. Due to the age of this text it is more possible that the implication was all humanoid life on earth.

3.        Yahweh said, "My Spirit will not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; yet will his days be one hundred twenty years." Some have suggested that this was an editor’s addition to the ancient texts, however, it is acknowledged by most to be authentic, and only to state that mankind has 120 years maximum before judgment. This clearly is the most likely interpretation for this passage, if truly authentic.

4.        Nephilim; The root of this word is the fallen, feller of trees, or the fallen ones. Some have surmised this is the fallen angels, others, that these were giants, the sense of this word is a tyrant, but in plural, rooted in the meaning of the fallen or to make fall. **

5.        “and also after that” achar; is a clear statement that these fallen, or the tyrant kind were on the earth in both pre-judgment and post judgment. This passage makes it clear that these Nephilim were both before and after the flood. **

6.        “mighty men” gibbowr; from the Hebrew, we derive warriors and tyrants, men of war, in a sense of brutality and tyranny. Tyrants, force by brutality, rule by terror, etc.

7.        “men of renown” shem or shame; in proportion to a position of stature, a ruler, either of fame or infamy, the leaders, rulers, or heads of state.

So we have this assumption to make, and it is clear, and this is that the sin, or the corruption stated in these passages was the inter-racial mongrelization of the races, multiculturalism at it’s first inception, with the Adamic race. We find from other passages in the Holy Scriptures that these “Sons of God” called Eloheem, were in fact the fallen angels, and these were here both before, during and after the flood. Now this can only be possible if the flood was a contained event, or the flooding of the land was as simple as stated, it was one land that flooded, and only this. With this understanding, we can then understand how the Orientals, the Negroes and the other various races all were not impacted or destroyed, further, the race of Cain was then also spared, as well as any of the accursed racial variations which were in this land region, but had migrated prior to the flood.

** Malachi 2:11 “Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of Yahweh which he loveth, and hath married the daughter of a foreign god.” Without mention that the more modern translations make the statement that this was a worshiper of a strange god, the literal sense was a descendant of a strange god, and these are the sons of God spoke of in the earlier passages. For further reference, we look again to the non-canonical books of the Bible and we find in Enoch 6 this passage, “And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto 2 them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men 3 and beget us children.” And so we have it that the races in the earth, the Aryan Race of the descendants of Adam, as well as possibly countless other races were cohabiting with the fallen angels, called “gods” many times throughout scriptures.

Our first conclusion is then that the people in this region, where Noah resided, were race-mixing, polluting themselves with this abomination, as well as the result of variations of the race being fathered by the fallen angels, all mixing and polluting themselves, creating one vile mess of a civilization.

What we can also determine is that these mongrelized hordes then became the majority, these same hordes then became the rulers of the region, using tyranny, bloodshed and all corrupt forms of terror to implement their nefarious will. We will learn more of what was happening in this first multicultural cesspool as the story progresses. So to conclude this first section, we need to acknowledge a few things, first, all races are not “God’s Children”, some are actually the descendants of the fallen angels. Also, we need to conclude, that like today, when the mongrels come to power, all forms of civility and order fall to chaos and tyranny, bloodshed and destruction, and Solomon said that there is nothing new under the sun. Third, we need to remember that all of these fallen races did not perish in this flood, because it was a regional flood, and this will also be proved later. Fourth, and foremost, what was considered the foremost sin was the racial corruption, the adulteration of the races, and mix breeding and destruction of the Aryan-Adamic race, the first recorded manifestation of a multicultural, diverse and racially impure populace in the Holy Scriptures.

2

Now I made the claim that Yahweh only spared Noah and His family because they were purebreds and undefiled in their racial composition, Just from the King James we can see without any explanation that there was a purity of Noah and his family that was different than the rest. I will use the correct meaning of these words from the Hebrew and from the elder languages to make sure there is no mistake in this claim of racial purity. In Act 1 we established that the Aryan-Adamic race had polluted itself with not just “women of strange flesh”, but many of these women or men were actually descended from demons. Once the superior in society, they began a campaign of abominable acts, tyranny, and all these things we are all too familiar with as society fails due to multiculturalism. We know the results of such societies as all those in the past have failed with great violence and tyranny, and we saw before Yahweh’s hatred of such social disorder, but the evidence shows that the destruction of this society was it’s racial adultery, and now in Act 2, we will see that Noah was spared because he had nothing to do with it.

Genesis 6:5 Yahweh saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 Yahweh was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him in his heart. 7 Yahweh said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the surface of the ground; man, along with animals, creeping things, and birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them." 8 But Noah found favor in Yahweh's eyes. 9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations,*** and Noah walked with God10 Noah became the father of three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. 11 The earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. 12 God saw the earth, and saw that it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth. 13 God said to Noah, "The end of all flesh has come before me, for the earth is filled with violence through them. Behold, I will destroy them with the earth.”

*** perfect in his generations, the Hebrew word translated as “Generations” here means “seed” literally, and race in modern translation.

Noah and his family were spared simply because they were of pure racial stock in danger of being consumed by “Diversity” and “Multi-Culturalism”, which, not much later in the Holy Scriptures we find the act of judgment against Babel for the same crimes, and also Sodom and Gomorrah were also destroyed, not simply for their sexual disorientation, but for their defilement of the flesh racially. Jude 1:7; “Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to impurity, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”

What did the Ark Look Like?

To make this simple, an Ark is a box, and is not a boat, the Ark of the Covenant was not a water vessel, and if Noah built a ship, the Scriptures would say that he built a ship. Considering that the Flood was an isolated event, and the Ark went up, and then went down, a ship was not necessary, and was not built. As the first Ark was built to save the Holy Seed of YAHWEH from racial destruction, and immanent danger, we find this Ark brought His people through to a better and unpolluted land. Likewise the second Ark was built as YAHWEH’S throne, a symbol of Him as His people were brought out of slavery and the risk of racial destruction, through a cleansing through the desert, as related to the waters of the Flood, and then to a new land for their racial health. This is the real significance of the Ark, and also the purpose of the Flood, as well as the facts about Noah’s Flood.

Conclusion

Between science, common sense, and closer examination of the Holy Scriptures, it is clear and obvious that the story we have been sold as “Noah’s Flood” is more in line with a childhood fable than with the scriptures. However, it is a relief to know that we are not related at all to the savage sub-human beasts like the niggers, the sub-negroid asiatics, or any of the bipedal animals that the usual “clergy” attempt to call our brothers in a “universal family”. Nor is any self-proclaimed “jew” any relation to the survivors of the Flood, unless their ancestors that survived it committed racial adultery with the Canaanite filth, thus becoming a modern “jew”. Noah’s Flood was a regional event, Yahweh’s wrath against a multicultural society where morality and the natural order of Aryan Rule collapsed into a Babylonian system of mongrel rule, lawlessness, and the usual degeneration of society associated with racial pollution and sub-human self rule.

Let us learn a lesson from this event, the true lesson as described in the Scriptures, when the Aryan pollutes his race, and lives among savages, not only can he expect to watch his world degenerate into a third-world cesspool, but he can be destroyed with it. This eminent destruction of Aryan rule was in fact, the reason Yahweh destroyed the Tarim Basin in a massive deluge, it was to destroy the multicultural cesspool, and the liberal mindset, which allowed it. Keep this in mind as the liberal preachers, also known as liars and scum, preach tolerance and diversity, love thy nigger, and all the other filthy lies you can expect from child molesters in the cloth, remember them when the time comes to cleanse this land.